Friday, October 19, 2007






Addio Zio Tom (1971) [Directors’ Cut]
Directed by Gualtiero Jacopetti & Franco Prosperi
Starring Gualtiero Jacopetti
136 mins; Not Rated; Colour

Previewed Release:
R0 Blue Underground (Shockumentary Extreme Collection)
Tagline: The film considered too shocking for the world.
Country of Origin: Italy

The Film:


Gualtiero Jacopetti and Franco Prosperi’s second last film as Mondo filmmakers, Addio Zio Tom, is a departure from their previous work, which focussed primarily on displaying real footage of unusual world events. Instead, the duo have fashioned a reconstruction of the 1800s era United States African slave trade. This directors’ cut version is one of the most controversial films ever committed to celluloid – potentially explosive narration of ambiguous racial stance, as well as the incredibly graphic footage of the slave trade and the overtones of today’s ‘reverse racism’ perpetrated by Afro-Americans makes this a genuine firestorm of a film.

The directors’ cut of Addio Zio Tom (translated to ‘Goodbye Uncle Tom’ in English and is a reference to the nickname the whites had of elderly African slaves) restores more than thirteen minutes of political and violent footage, removes alternate scenes added to replace the controversial ones and reinserts the film’s original narration. The film begins with footage of Martin Luther King’s funeral and the race riots that resulted, as well as scenes in which black militants are seen to indoctrinate young Afro-American children into hating, and committing violence against, white people. This footage is presumably authentic; however the film soon changes gear and focuses on Jacopetti and Prosperi’s realistic reconstruction of the slave trade over a hundred years earlier. We see the African slaves being mercilessly transported on boats and punished by their white ‘masters’. Occasionally, Jacopetti and Prosperi revert back to real-life modern day footage as a juxtaposition of the Afro-American then and now, all of which was removed for the film’s English language release. Finally, Addio Zio Tom climaxes in the story of Nat Turner, a legend among the Afro-American community in which a gang of black slaves take bloody revenge upon their white captors.

Beautifully shot and with a magnificent score by exploitation music maestro Riz Ortolani, Addio Zio Tom is an unmissable piece of Italian cinema. Visually, Jacopetti and Prosperi are at their most striking and, while it may not be as shocking as their 1966 previous feature Africa Addio (the violent footage was all horribly real there), Addio Zio Tom is an impactful masterpiece. It is hard to ascertain whether this can be considered an exploitation film, or whether it is a racist tract – indeed, it can certainly be said that Jacopetti and Prosperi didn’t want their film to be read as such, and the duo said that Addio Zio Tom was an attempt to redeem themselves after similar accusations of racism in light of the controversy generated by Africa Addio. Regardless of their intentions, or how the film plays out, this has become essential viewing.

The Release:

Extras wise this version is poor, but there are further special features on the English version of the film, titled Goodbye Uncle Tom. The picture has been presented in the 2:35:1 aspect ratio with 16:9 enhancement and it looks superb. Audio is presented in an Italian Dolby Digital mono track with optional English subtitles. This DVD is not available individually, however can be found in either the Shockumentary Extreme Collection or Mondo Cane Collection sets.

The Bottom Line:

Violent, controversial and tackling an aspect of society that even the most daring filmmakers fear to tread, Addio Zio Tom is one film that could genuinely never be produced today. The ambiguity of Jacopetti and Prosperi’s racial stance has long led to this being slammed as anti-black and it was poorly received upon its initial release for this reason. Blue Underground, with the collaboration of Jacopetti himself, has magnificently restored this directors’ cut to DVD, and it is essential for fans of explosive, subversive cinema.

Blood Feast (1963)
Directed by Herschell Gordon Lewis
Starring William Kerwin, Mal Arnold
67 mins; R18+; Colour

Previewed Release:
R0 Siren Visual
Tagline: Nothing so appalling in the annals of horror.
Country of Origin: USA

The Film:

The latest craze in horror cinema has now become the likes of Saw, Hostel and the like – but shock! horror! the inspiration of these films are not wholly original. In fact, one film preceded them by forty odd years. Enter Herschell Gordon Lewis and David F Friedman. These two men made (with the former directing and the latter producing) a number of films within the ‘nudie cutie’ genre during the early sixties – pictures that were sexy to be sure, but by today’s standards milder than the mellowest of softcore. The genre dried up (forgive the pun), and the duo turned to horror for inspiration – specifically, the gore movie. In 1963, the partnership wielded Blood Feast, a film that would become the first gore picture and, in its relish in showing claret-drenched set pieces and gross-out horror, became direct inspiration for contemporary horror cinema.

Blood Feast, by most standards, is technically poor and appallingly acted, however it has charm in spades. Mal Arnold plays Fued Ramses, an Egyptian caterer. Ramses however, is more than he appears – his delicious food spreads are made from the body parts of young women as a sacrifice to an ancient god. When Dorothy Fremont (Lyn Bolton) enlists Ramses to cater for her daughter Suzane’s engagement party (have you ever had…an Egyptian…feast?), Ramses immediately sets the plans in motion. Women are slaughtered brutally and it is up to Detective Thornton (Kerwin, under the pseudonym Thomas Wood) to foil his plans.

Lewis created a monster with Blood Feast. Every horror fan, or at least, any fan of the modern violent excesses of shock cinema, owe their viewing pleasures to the films of Herschell Gordon Lewis. Blood Feast was the first in Lewis’ Blood Trilogy, which consisted of the fantastic Two Thousand Maniacs! and somewhat inferior Colour me Blood Red. This 1963 film also spawned a sequel in 2002 directed by Lewis after a thirty year directing hiatus.

The Release:

This Siren release is mastered from the Something Weird Video release in the USA, and it’s certainly not as good as other HGL discs distributed. There’s a quizzical short Carving Magic, which is certainly not worth the time of day. Trailers and outtakes make up the rest. The absence of a Lewis commentary is disappointing, considering almost every other one of his films have been treated to one.



The Bottom Line:

Blood Feast is a seminal moment in horror cinema, and one that every fan of any film with gore as a pivotal plot device should hold dear. Herschell Gordon Lewis genuinely revolutionised the genre by making an edgy indie film that appalled almost everyone who saw it – accusations of misogyny and corruption of children run rampant but, in true decadent sixties form, Lewis and Friedman continued to collaborate until their untimely professional break-up. Blood Feast is poorly acted to be sure, but the gore is a sight to behold – the fact that the Australian Office of Film and Literature Classification gave this film an 18 certificate in 2005, the year they gave the supposedly uber-shocking Saw II a 15, indicates how well it holds up today. A landmark picture, highly recommended.



La Settima Donna (1978)
Directed by Franco Prosperi
Starring Florinda Bolkan, Ray Lovelock
67 mins; R18+; Colour

Previewed Release:
R2 Sazuma
Tagline: None.
Country of Origin: Italy

The Film:

Wow. This is absolutely amazing.

As a Grindhouse film, La Settima Donna (known as ‘Terror’ or ‘Last House on the Beach’ to Western audiences, the latter name in order to capitalise on Wes Craven’s seminal 1972 horror picture Last House on the Left) delivers the goods. As an exploitation opus, La Settima Donna delivers the goods. As an Italian giallo, La Settima Donna delivers the goods.

The other film by Franco Prosperi, who delivered no less than Mondo Cane and Addio Zio Tom, La Settima Donna (which translates to 'The Seventh Woman') is the story of Sister Cristina (Bolkan), who has taken a group of teenage girls to a beach house to rehearse a play. Things quickly go awry when a misanthropic trio of bank robbers (including Lovelock as Aldo) select the secluded coastal hideaway as a refuge from the police, who are hot on their tail. The three criminals terrorise the young women until finally things become desperately undone.

One of the greatest attributes of La Settima Donna is undoubtedly its cinematography. Christiano Pogany does an inimitable job at lensing this picture in a magnificent fashion, and Sazuma’s sensational transfer does it justice. Prosperi directs with endless flair, and his stylisation of La Settima Donna’s grimy content, including a number of exceedingly nasty scenes of sexual violence, makes for a truly uncomfortable experience. It certainly goes to show that Prosperi can direct an excellent, albeit shocking, film without Gualtiero Jacopetti, his long time partner-in-crime with the aforementioned Mondo pictures. The acting is certainly above average for a film of this type, with both Bolkan and Lovelock turning in reasonable performances, as do their co-stars, varying responses from trauma to malevolence, depending on which side of the gun you find yourself on.

The Release:

Sazuma have put together a fantastic release of La Settima Donna, and one which it wholly deserves. Most notably is a twenty-odd minute interview with Ray Lovelock, where he talks about his experiences with Prosperi and on the film set. Alternate title sequences, trailers and TV spots fill out the scenery. The film itself looks magnificent with an almost-flawless transfer, and the picture is presented in the 2:35:1 ratio with 16:9 enhancement. There are three audio tracks – Italian, German and English – and all are presented in Dolby 2.0. English and German subtitles for both the interview and the film itself are provided.

Also included is a soundtrack of Roberto Pregadio’s funk Muzak score, which adds a trifle more to the pseudo-porn soundtracks by the likes of Goblin and Nico Fidenco.

The Bottom Line:

Despite what its Anglicised alternate title suggests, La Settima Donna is far from a rip-off of Last House on the Left. Prosperi has fashioned an exceedingly smart and visually striking Grindhouse picture that is a viciously underrated slice of Eurotrash cinema. I can’t recommend this highly enough.



Antropophagus (1980)
Directed by Joe D’Amato
Starring Tisa Farrow, George Eastman
90 mins; Not Rated; Colour

Previewed Release:
R1 Shriek Show 2-disc
Tagline: He’s coming for you!
Country of Origin: Italy

The Film:

When the cover sleeve of a film shows a malformed giant eating his own intestines, you just know you’re in for a good time.

Antropophagous is from the notorious Eurotrash master and, in his later years, prolific pornographer Joe D’Amato, and is one of the most reviled video nasties of the gore-soaked era. Also known as The Grim Reaper, possibly for audiences who couldn’t spell, Antropophagus stars Tisa Farrow (Zombie) as Julie who, along with a number of other young people, travels to a picturesque island to meet with some friends. Trouble is, the island hosts the dark secret of the Antropophagus (Eastman; who co-scripted with D’Amato) – a psychotic killer with more than a few skeletons in his closet. The group are left to fight for their lives as the Antropophagous (is he man? Beast? Entity?) dispatches them in exceedingly brutal ways.

While it isn’t D’Amato’s horror opus (this dubious honour is held by Beyond the Darkness, a meaner, leaner exploitation epic), Antropophagous is a decent entry into the Eurotrash cycle and its grisly effects has led it to be reviled the world over. The picture also adopts an eerie Gothic quality, an evocation that is surprisingly well executed considering the obvious budget constraints impinged upon the production. D’Amato and Eastman followed Antropophagous with a sequel one year later titled Absurd, and while it adopted some notoriety, it has fallen into the realms of B-grade obscurity. D’Amato’s output following this was scant, at least in the field of exploitation – he directed a number of Emanuelle sequels with Laura Gemser in the title role and some quizzical pseudo-hardcore zombie films, before lensing some one hundred straight-to-video hardcore porn films before his death of a heart attach in 1999.

The Release:

One of Shriek Show’s better releases, this disc contains the original Italian and English tracks in mono, the former with optional English subtitles. The film itself is presented in 1:66:1 anamorphic widescreen, which is the best it has ever looked on DVD. The extras are fantastic; there is the second half of a documentary on D’Amato (the first is found on the Shriek Show disc Images of a Convent), alternate openings, interviews with Eastman and star Zora Kerova and trailers for this film, and others.

The Bottom Line:



While not fantastic, Italo-exploitation puritans would find a lot to love in Antropophagous, not least the bloody set-pieces which unfortunately only really get going in the film’s final ten minutes. There are a number of scenes that remind you of the eighties controversy this film generated, not least the evisceration of a pregnant woman. D’Amato and Eastman should be commended on the atmosphere their script evokes – moments recall an almost Bava-esque Gothic quality. The acting is beyond bad, though Eastman turns in a decent performance. Recommended… if you’re into this sort of thing.

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

An Interview With Andrey Iskanov


AN INTERVIEW WITH ANDREY ISKANOV



01.10.2007


Andrey Iskanov is one of the most exciting independent horror filmmakers operating in the European arthouse/exploitation new-wave cycle. With films such as Nails and Visions of Suffering generating some genuine cult appeal, Andrey has developed a solid fan base, particularly online and in light of his films being released by major US cult distributor Unearthed Films. Andrey speaks to MJ Reviews about his upcoming film, a 4-hour World War II opus Philosophy of a Knife, and the trials and tribulations of filmmaking in his mother country, Russia.

First of all, thank you very much for the interview. We appreciate it and realise you're very busy with all the work with Philosophy of a Knife .
I finished work on Philosophy of a Knife about half-year back. Now I work on editing of the new film named The Tourist. It's fantastic film in traditions of Body Snatchers and They Live. For me the best rest is change of activity. I can not stay idle longer several days. After The Tourist I shall start to do something else. Philosophy of a Knife has taken away too many time from me and now I should make up for lost time.

You hail from Russia that is a nation where we, as native English-speaking nations, see very few films.What is the process to make and market a film in Russia?

How I do films in Russia? It is a theme for the whole book How to Make Something From Nothing. And I'm sure that if you, people of the Western world, have read it, you would not believe me. Each time it's like being sent to war, just to make a film.You would be at war for each shot of the film.When you start to make film in Russia, in those conditions in which I make it, it seems, that all universe rise against you. Everything that seems to you norm, is inadmissible luxury here. Russia is a certain antiworld where creation of films is the form of guerrilla military movement.

And is horror a well-received genre there?
If it was so, Russia probably would gush forth films of horrors! I can list all horror (much or less of the term) films made in Russia for last 40 years faster than you can spell Texas Chainsaw Massacre. But Nails was the first film in this genre for all last years. I already many times spoke that horror is not a popular genre in Russia. Dario Argento could not make here the film and was compelled to leave for other European country where he could work normally. And I could not make anything at a level, the big official cinema. Unique real films of horrors which can be made in Russia, can be made only for the own account and own efforts. Russia is still outside of the civilized film-world. Who knows how many years that Russia would learn to perceive films of horror just as spectators of other countries will leave. Communists, with the help of long-term isolation and cultivation, have deduced special genetic type of person which whose perception of the world in the cardinal image differs from people evolved outside of limits of the Russian system.

In 2003 you directed Nails. What got you into the movie-making business?
I waited a long time. Too long. About what I regret the only thing, that I have not made Nails, for example, in 1996. I hoped to interest somebody in my ideas and to find financing for my projects. Probably such happens in USA, England or other countries. I dont know. But now, from my own experience, I'm firmly convinced that in Russia such situation is impossible! If you have ideas and you want to embody them in a reality, do not wait for anybody! Anybody will not help you. Rise and do all. Its a real pity, that I cant turn back time. Too much time and force was spent for empty expectations.
You multi-tasked fairly broadly with Nails, and you starred in, produced, composed the music for, wrote and edited the film, as well as working on visual and make-up effects. How long did the film take to be made, from its beginnings on paper to its release with Unearthed Films and what was your goal with it?
We have photographed and have edited Nails for some days. It's my personal record, since then I never did films so quickly. In total, from paper until the completed film, it has probably occupied one month or hardly more. But three years passed before Unearthed Films have released the film on DVD. However, Nails was released in Russia on VHS in the same 2003. Today in Nails I would make it differently. Its sure, that it is much better. If in your country somebody will wish to release my film, I am ready to make remastering film in such case. It's a little to improve the image and a sound, a little to change editing.
You then directed Visions of Suffering, which was a similarly surreal and violent film. Was it a different experience on set to Nails and your previous films?

I have made Visions of Suffering in the same 2003 as Nails. Also there were no distinctions in comparison with its creation and creation of my previous films. The film was based on a dreadful dream and consequently few could estimate its primary idea. Unless others shared my nightmares? My experience with Visions of Suffering has convinced me that surrealism is not liked by modern spectators, unfortunately. Meanwhile I do not have any desire to make something in similar mood again. Today, strange fairy tales are very badly sold. Ultraviolent modern histories are necessary for spectators. Everyone ask me only how how much blood, gore and violence is in my new film, and anybody yet has not asked me about what there will be this film and what actors participate.
Tell us a little bit about Philosophy of a Knife.
Very personal film for me for which creation I have spent four years of my life. I was an obsessive idea to tell to people the truth about Unit 731 [a Japanese torture/experiment camp in World War II]. I knew that I had more than creative opportunities to make it than anybody, then or now. Nobody to dare to make such film today even if will have millions of dollars. You never will see anything similar of Hollywood or anyone large film producer. Anybody in senses will not enclose the money in four hour film devoted to death and cruelty. The Philosophy of a Knife becomes the new Testament of modern violent cinema. But it not simply violent and fucking gore film. Not at all! Do not deceive itself. Its film with idea, film research. Film the message, if you want.

There’s been some controversy with Philosophy, particularly with Unearthed’s treatment of various cuts. Can you elaborate on that and provide us with the latest information regarding this?

The shorter film is more easy to work to the distributor. Philosophy of a Knife is film in two separate parts, the general duration more than four hours.I did the film for release on DVD, therefore I did not see in its length of any problem. You can look the first part tonight and the second part in the evening of tomorrow. Or both parts for one evening, one by one. Business of your taste. Which that history film is devoted is too serious and too deep, that I would presume to reduce to myself it for the sake of profit the distributor. Probably, I'm the worst producer in the world because I create films that are very inconvenient for all. Both for distributors and for spectators. And the more problems, the worse for sales. But I for anything did not presume to not show myself to the spectator that considered for itself important in a history about Unit 731. Whether its possible to tell about whose that life and death for one and a half hour? Probably it's possible. But I do not want to hasten and tell a history on running. Extinguish light, sit, turn on DVD player and watch. You will have enough time what to learn all that I wanted to tell to you about a sad history of Unit 731. Whether they wanted to cut film? Now another is important. Now to me promised, that film will not be reduced.


How does Philosophy compare visually and stylistically with your other films?
Approximately as well as if to compare Elephant Man produced by Mel Brooks to other films which were produced by him. For example with Spaceballs or The Producers, etc. Invented film of horrors is one thing, a drama on the basis of horrible events it absolutely another. Certainly in film there is what that my trademarks, but its difficult for me to speak about it, I seldom pay to this attention. As a rule, I do not like my films at all. But Philosophy of a Knife is a rare case when I like it very much.

What do you hope to achieve as a director?

That my films would be remembered long after I am no more. It is the best guarantor of quality of any film. If a film is forgotten soon after its ending, it means that the child was born deadborn and its authors simply all for nothing have spent time and forces. I do not want to make through passage films, films which to me will not be interesting. Till now so it also was. And still I would like to have more opportunities for creation of films. Meanwhile they are very much limited.

You're becoming quite a force within the independent horror film genre, and a great deal of interest regarding you and your films has been generated across the Internet. How do you respond to this?

It is not reflected in any way in me personally. I live in Russia and if in the next apartment near tomine will live Vincent Price or Bela Lugosi, all here would spit on them. For example, if I am taken for creating advertising videos for a local advertising agency and I speak, that I the director of horror and surrealistic films, well known in the West, managers of agency are interested and whether in general I'm able to shoot and edit something? I live too far from those countries where these word shave any sense and value. Sometimes I read about myself in Internet. I'm glad when I read about myself something good. And turn sad, when I read about myself something bad. It's everything, that I could tell. Probably, if I lived somewhere in New York or Toronto, it would have the greater meaning. But unfortunately for all of us I live in Khabarovsk. You can find this city (by the way, its image is present on the largest monetary denomination of Russia in 5,000 roubles) on a map of the world, from three attempts? Well all right, let even from ten?

Are there any future projects on the horizon?

It is a lot of. Now I finish editing my new film The Tourist. And it will be then possible, Angel dust for example. And also one more new film with infernal violence. Without dependence that I think of violence, its sure, very much many will want more and more after will see Philosophy of a Knife. And by the way i have good plot. And not one, by the way.

Finally, Andrey, thank you very much for this interview. We really appreciate it and wish you the best of luck with Philosophy of a Knife and your future projects.

I was late with the answer a little. Here in Russia each new day creates to you all new and new problems from which it seems there is in general no rescue. For example, for one month vanishes Internet connection and nobody wishes to be engaged in it even if you always pay in time. Or something even worse. Anyway, many thanks to you for your patience. Good luck!